The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown, has sparked a lot of controversy - and rightly so - as it attempts to pass off fiction as fact. Fiction that, if taken as fact, discredits the Roman Catholic Church specifically, and Christianity in general.
Unfortunately, many people are taking this fictitious work as fact, partly because of the packaging of the book. On the first page, under the bold-faced word "FACT" comes the following sentence: “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.” As a friend of mine pointed out, this made him wonder at first, until he read it again, and realized something: all the descriptions of these documents could easily be accurate, even though the conclusions drawn from them could be completely false. Still, for those not as astute as my friend, this simply translates as "This stuff is all true." What's worse, however, is that apparently not even this statement lives up to its claim of truth. Scholars who have studied the same documents as Dan Brown, point out that even his descriptions are flawed, and his data wrong (the most simple of which is giving the wrong date for the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls). [For more, view these articles: 1,2,3,4]
So where does that leave us? Sitting with a runaway best-seller that many people are taking as truth, and it is affecting their beliefs about Jesus, the Church, and Christianity. A recent poll in England shows that people are "now twice as likely to believe Jesus Christ fathered children ... and four times as likely to think the conservative Catholic group Opus Dei is a murderous sect." (Reuters)
Continue reading "The Cracking Da Vinci Code" »